chess friends

Chess Friends

Participate and you will discover!
Strange name, real interests
[ Sign up | Log in | Guest ] (beta)
cryptos 37 ( +1 | -1 )
najdorf - sozin attack. I'm a bit confused about a line in the sozin attack.
After:-
1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.d4 cxd4
4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 a6
6.Bc4 e6
7.Bb3 b5
8.0-0 Be7
9.Qf3! Qc7!?
10.e5!? Bb7
11. Qg3!?

black must move his knight. White then has the possibility of sacrificing his bishop on e6 with an attack, which I think is pretty strong. Yet the line up to 10...Bb7 is supposed to be the standard way to meet 9.Qf3! Can anybody tell me why the attack wouldn't work (concrete variations please)? Regards, Cryptos :)

jesperbb 39 ( +1 | -1 )
Hi i checked my database + 3million games and found one i think it is simply bad!

Turner,J - Lea,E [B87]
WLS-ch Cardiff (3), 1996

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4 e6 7.Bb3 Be7 8.0-0 b5 9.Qf3 Qc7 10.e5 Bb7 11.exd6 Bxd6 12.Qh3 0-0 13.f4 b4 14.Nce2 Nc6 15.c3 Nxd4 16.cxd4 Rfe8 17.Be3 Nd5 18.Rac1 Qe7 19.Rf3 Nxe3 20.Rxe3 Qf6 21.Bc2 g6 22.Rf1 Rac8 23.Bd3 Bb8 24.g4 Ba7 25.f5 exf5 26.Rf4 Rxe3 27.Qxe3 Qc6 28.Kf2 Bb8 29.d5 Qxd5 30.Rxb4 Bd6 31.Nf4 Qxa2 32.Bc4 Bxb4 33.Bxa2 Bc5 34.gxf5 Bxe3+ 35.Kxe3 Re8+ 36.Kf2 Re4 37.Kg3 Re3+ 38.Kh4 Kg7 39.Bd5 Bxd5 40.f6+ Kf8 41.Nxd5 Re2 42.b4 Rxh2+ 43.Kg4 Rd2 44.Nc7 Rd4+ 45.Kg5 Rxb4 46.Nxa6 Rb5+ 47.Kg4 h5+ 48.Kh4 Rb6 49.Nc5 Ke8 50.Nd3 Rxf6 51.Kg5 Rf5+ 52.Kh4 Ke7 53.Ne1 Ke6 54.Ng2 Rf1 55.Ne3 Rg1 56.Kh3 f5 57.Kh2 Ra1 58.Nc4 g5 59.Kg3 Ra4 60.Nd2 Ra3+ 61.Kf2 Ra2 0-1

philaretus 23 ( +1 | -1 )
cryptos I don't know what makes you think that 10...Bb7 is "the standard way" to meet 9.Qf3. I can't find any games with this line of play. This is not surprising, because 10.e5? seems to be a poor move, the obvious reply being 10...dxe5!
sualksnh 18 ( +1 | -1 )
11...dxe5! I don't think that Black must move the Knight after 11.Qg3. He can simply take on e5. After 11...dxe5 it's not easy for White to equalize. 12.Qxg7 is impossible because of 12...Rg8 and 13...Rxg2+.
cryptos 73 ( +1 | -1 )
sorry, I didn't make myself clear Sorry, I should've made it clear that after 11...dxe5?! , taking with the bishop on e6 starts the attack and immediately wins back the pawn. If the sacrifice is accepted, white takes back with the knight, attacking the queen and following up with Nxg7+. Black's pawn cover is shredded, with a probable white win. Philaretus, my point was that 9...Qc7!? is supposed to prevent 10 e5!?, but after black moves the light-squared bishop he leaves e6 exposed, which Najdorf players know is a weak spot for a sacrifice. sualksnh, I know Qxg7 is impossible at this point. Also 11...dxe5 opens the d-file for white's rook if the king tries to escape to the queenside. Still not sure 10. e5!? is bad. :)
christian1974 18 ( +1 | -1 )
10 e5 is just about playable with the game quoted above being the usual reference game. 10 ... dxe5? is unplayable due to Ndxb5! which is very good for white.
cryptos 33 ( +1 | -1 )
seems there's only 2 games. I looked on chessbase and there's only 2 games where 10. e5 !? is tried, one being the Turner - Lea game posted above. I think Turner played pretty poorly in this game, though, playing 11. exd6 and allowing black to develop his dark-squared bishop rather nicely. I think 11. Qg3!? is a more interesting try.